GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs Radeon R9 A375
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 A375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 A375
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 A375 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1124.1% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 A375.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1124.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1124.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 187% better value per dollar than the Radeon R9 A375.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+187%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Radeon R9 A375
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Radeon R9 A375
The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Radeon R9 A375's 1,024 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 1124.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+1124% | 1,024 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+300% | 640 |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+92% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 A375 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 A375 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 125% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 30W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 242mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+183% | 34.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49 and now averages $49. The Radeon R9 A375 costs 76.6% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 187.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $49-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209 | $49-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0+187% | 20.9 |
| Codename | GA106 | Venus |
| Release | January 4 2022 | 2015 |
| Ranking | #211 | #877 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Radeon R9 A375
