Radeon 535 vs Radeon HD 6700M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 535 vs Radeon HD 6700M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 535 vs Radeon HD 6700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 535

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6700M

2011

Why buy it

✅45.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6700M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 535 instead at 1,049 vs 1,017, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 535 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 535 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6700M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon 535 vs Radeon HD 6700M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 535

The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 6700M

The Radeon HD 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,017 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 535 scores 1,049 and the Radeon HD 6700M reaches 1,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 535 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD 6700M uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 535) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6700M). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6700M).

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon HD 6700M
G3D Mark Score	1,049+3%	1,017
Architecture	GCN 4.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512	960+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.211 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	128 KB	192 KB+50%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon HD 6700M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 535 and System on the Radeon HD 6700M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon 535) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6700M) — the Radeon HD 6700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon HD 6700M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 535 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 6700M's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 535 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon 535) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6700M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon HD 6700M
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	21.0+54%	13.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 535 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon HD 6700M
MSRP	$100	—
Codename	Lexa	Blackcomb
Release	April 20 2017	January 4 2011
Ranking	#668	#654

Search Radeon 535 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6700M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.