Radeon 535 vs Radeon HD 6700M
Radeon 535
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 535 is positioned at rank 119 and the Radeon HD 6700M is on rank 366, so the Radeon 535 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 535
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6700M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 535 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Radeon 535 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6700M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 535 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6700M.
| Insight | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 535 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 535 and Radeon HD 6700M
Radeon 535
The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.
Radeon HD 6700M
The Radeon HD 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,017 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 535 scores 1,049 and the Radeon HD 6700M reaches 1,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 535 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD 6700M uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 535) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6700M). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6700M).
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,049+3% | 1,017 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 960+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS | 1.306 TFLOPS+8% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon 535) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6700M) — the Radeon HD 6700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 535 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 6700M's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 535 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon 535) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6700M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 21.0+54% | 13.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 535 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | — |
| Codename | Lexa | Blackcomb |
| Release | April 20 2017 | January 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #668 | #654 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 535 and Radeon HD 6700M
