Radeon 530 vs Radeon 535

AMD

Radeon 530

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 535

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 530 vs Radeon 535 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 530 vs Radeon 535 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 530 vs Radeon 535: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 530

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon 535 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon 535

2017

Why buy it

  • 18.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 535 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (1,049 vs 1,037), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 530 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 535 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon 535 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 530 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 530 vs Radeon 535 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 530

The Radeon 530 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,037 points.

AMD

Radeon 535

The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 530 scores 1,037 and the Radeon 535 reaches 1,049 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 530 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon 535 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 530) vs 512 (Radeon 535). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 530) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 530Radeon 535
G3D Mark Score
1,037
1,049+1%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7864 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+54%
Boost Clock
1024 MHz
1183 MHz+16%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
96 KB
128 KB+33%
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 530Radeon 535
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 530 and 64-bit on the Radeon 535. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 530) vs 256 KB (Radeon 535) — the Radeon 535 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 530Radeon 535
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 530 draws 50W versus the Radeon 535's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 535 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 530) vs 300W (Radeon 535). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureRadeon 530Radeon 535
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
20.7
21.0+1%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 530 came in at $0, while the Radeon 535 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon 530 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon 530) vs 10.5 (Radeon 535) — the Radeon 530 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureRadeon 530Radeon 535
MSRP
$0-100%
$100
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
10.5
Codename
Weston
Lexa
Release
April 18 2017
April 20 2017
Ranking
#873
#668

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.