Radeon 530 vs Radeon R9 A375

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 530 vs Radeon R9 A375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 530 vs Radeon R9 A375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 530

2017

Why buy it

✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 A375 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Radeon R9 A375

2015

Why buy it

✅39.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 A375 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 39.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 530 instead at 1,037 vs 1,024, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 530 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 A375 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 A375 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 530 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 530 vs Radeon R9 A375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 530

The Radeon 530 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,037 points.

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 530 scores 1,037 and the Radeon R9 A375 reaches 1,024 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 530 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 530) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 530	Radeon R9 A375
G3D Mark Score	1,037+1%	1,024
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Boost Clock	1024 MHz+11%	925 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 530	Radeon R9 A375
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 530 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 A375.

Feature	Radeon 530	Radeon R9 A375
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon 530) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon 530	Radeon R9 A375
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_0
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon 530) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	Radeon 530	Radeon R9 A375
Encoder	VCE 3.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD 6.0	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 530 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 530) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon 530	Radeon R9 A375
TDP	50W	30W-40%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	20.7	34.1+65%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 530 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon 530 was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon 530) vs 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) — the Radeon 530 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 530 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon 530	Radeon R9 A375
MSRP	$0-100%	$49
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	20.9
Codename	Weston	Venus
Release	April 18 2017	2015
Ranking	#873	#877

Search Radeon 530 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 A375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.