Radeon 530 vs Radeon HD 6750

AMD

Radeon 530

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6750

2011Boost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 530 vs Radeon HD 6750 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 530 vs Radeon HD 6750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 530 vs Radeon HD 6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 530

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 86W, a 36W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6750

2011

Why buy it

  • 4.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 72% higher power demand at 86W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6750 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (1,046 vs 1,037), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 530 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6750 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 530 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 530 vs Radeon HD 6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 530

The Radeon 530 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,037 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6750

The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 530 scores 1,037 and the Radeon HD 6750 reaches 1,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 530 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon HD 6750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 530) vs 720 (Radeon HD 6750). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 530) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 530Radeon HD 6750
G3D Mark Score
1,037
1,046
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
720+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7864 TFLOPS
1.008 TFLOPS+28%
Boost Clock
1024 MHz+14%
900 MHz
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
36+50%
L1 Cache
96 KB+33%
72 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 530Radeon HD 6750
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 530 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6750 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 6750 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 530 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6750. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 530) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6750) — the Radeon HD 6750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 530Radeon HD 6750
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon 530) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon 530Radeon HD 6750
DirectX
12 (12_0)+7%
11.2 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon 530) vs None (Radeon HD 6750). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon 530) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750).

FeatureRadeon 530Radeon HD 6750
Encoder
VCE 3.0
None
Decoder
UVD 6.0
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 530 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 6750's 86W — a 52.9% difference. The Radeon 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 530) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.

FeatureRadeon 530Radeon HD 6750
TDP
50W-42%
86W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
170mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75
75
Perf/Watt
20.7+70%
12.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 530 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 6750 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon 530 was 100+% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon 530) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) — the Radeon 530 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 530 (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon 530Radeon HD 6750
MSRP
$0-100%
$109
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
9.6
Codename
Weston
Juniper
Release
April 18 2017
January 21 2011
Ranking
#873
#872

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.