
Radeon 530

Radeon R7 M465
Radeon 530 vs Radeon R7 M465 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 530 vs Radeon R7 M465 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon 530 vs Radeon R7 M465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 530
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M465 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
Radeon R7 M465
2016Why buy it
- ✅8.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 530 vs Radeon R7 M465 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 530
The Radeon 530 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,037 points.

Radeon R7 M465
The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 530 scores 1,037 and the Radeon R7 M465 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 530 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R7 M465 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 530) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M465). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 530) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1125 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,037 | 1,059+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 0.864 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 1125 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 530 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465.
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon 530) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M465). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon 530) vs VCE 3.1 (Radeon R7 M465). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon 530) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M465).
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 3.1 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 530 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M465's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 530) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.7+47% | 14.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon 530 came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 M465 launched at $120. On MSRP, Radeon 530 was 100+% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon 530) vs 8.8 (Radeon R7 M465) — the Radeon 530 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 530 (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon 530 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 8.8 |
| Codename | Weston | Topaz |
| Release | April 18 2017 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #873 | #867 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














