GeForce 920MX vs Radeon 535

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 920MX is positioned at rank 360 and the Radeon 535 is on rank 119, so the Radeon 535 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX

#350

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1020%

#352

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

925%

#353

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

923%

#357

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

839%

#358

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

833%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

100%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

100%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

99%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

95%

#369

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

94%

#370

GeForce GT 730A

MSRP: $75|Avg: $20

93%

#372

Radeon HD 7660G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

90%

#373

Radeon R7 M270DX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

90%

#374

Radeon HD 6670/7670

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

90%

#375

Radeon 620

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 535

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

692%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

664%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

657%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

655%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

654%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

650%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

642%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

640%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

634%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

632%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

625%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

623%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

612%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

612%

#84

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H

MSRP: $350|Avg: $350

94%

#104

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

763%

#119

Radeon 535

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

100%

#122

GeForce GTS 450

MSRP: $129|Avg: $20

99%

#123

Radeon HD 8570D

MSRP: $40|Avg: $15

98%

#125

Radeon HD 8650G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

96%

#126

GeForce GT 630

MSRP: $69|Avg: $20

95%

#127

Radeon HD 6770

MSRP: $129|Avg: $129

94%

#129

GeForce GT 440

MSRP: $79|Avg: $40

93%

#130

Radeon R7 340

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

92%

#133

Radeon HD 6750

MSRP: $109|Avg: $109

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 920MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 535.

Insight	GeForce 920MX	Radeon 535
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 920MX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 920MX holds the technical lead. Priced at $54 (vs $100), it costs 46% less, resulting in a 87.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce 920MX	Radeon 535
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+87.8%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($54)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 920MX Benchmark Check

Radeon 535 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920MX and Radeon 535

GeForce 920MX

The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

Radeon 535

The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920MX scores 1,064 and the Radeon 535 reaches 1,049 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920MX is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 535 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920MX) vs 512 (Radeon 535). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon 535
G3D Mark Score	1,064+1%	1,049
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	256	512+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	1.211 TFLOPS+138%
Boost Clock	993 MHz	1183 MHz+19%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon 535
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon 535) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon 535
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920MX draws 16W versus the Radeon 535's 50W — a 103% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920MX) vs 300W (Radeon 535). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon 535
TDP	16W-68%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Perf/Watt	66.5+217%	21.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 920MX launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $54, while the Radeon 535 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The GeForce 920MX costs 46% less ($46 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) vs 10.5 (Radeon 535) — the GeForce 920MX offers 87.6% better value. The Radeon 535 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).