
Radeon 535 vs Radeon HD 6750

Radeon 535
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 535 is positioned at rank 119 and the Radeon HD 6750 is on rank 133, so the Radeon 535 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 535
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 535 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Radeon 535 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 535 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 535 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon 535 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $109), it costs 8% less, resulting in a 9.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+9.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($109) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 535 and Radeon HD 6750

Radeon 535
The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 6750
The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 535 scores 1,049 and the Radeon HD 6750 reaches 1,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 535 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD 6750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 535) vs 720 (Radeon HD 6750). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,049 | 1,046 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 720+41% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS+20% | 1.008 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1183 MHz+31% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 36+13% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+78% | 72 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 535 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6750 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 6750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 535 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 6750's 86W — a 52.9% difference. The Radeon 535 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon 535) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6750). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-42% | 86W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 21.0+72% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 535 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon HD 6750 launched at $109 and now averages $109. The Radeon 535 costs 8.3% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.5 (Radeon 535) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) — the Radeon 535 offers 9.4% better value. The Radeon 535 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-8% | $109 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-8% | $109 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.5+9% | 9.6 |
| Codename | Lexa | Juniper |
| Release | April 20 2017 | January 21 2011 |
| Ranking | #668 | #872 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















