Radeon 535 vs Radeon R7 250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 535 vs Radeon R7 250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 535 vs Radeon R7 250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 535

2017

Why buy it

✅15.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
12.4% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 535 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 535 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 250 instead at 1,051 vs 1,049, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 535 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 250 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $11 cheaper on MSRP at $89 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 12.6% (11.8 vs 10.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 535 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 535 vs Radeon R7 250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 535

The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 535 scores 1,049 and the Radeon R7 250 reaches 1,051 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 535 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 535) vs 384 (Radeon R7 250). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon R7 250
G3D Mark Score	1,049	1,051
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512+33%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.211 TFLOPS+50%	0.8064 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1183 MHz+13%	1050 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon R7 250
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 535 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250 carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 250 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 535 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250.

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon R7 250
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 535 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 250's 65W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon 535 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon 535) vs 300W (Radeon R7 250). Power connectors: None vs None.

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon R7 250
TDP	50W-23%	65W
Recommended PSU	300W	300W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	21.0+30%	16.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 535 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 250 launched at $89. On MSRP, Radeon R7 250 was 11% cheaper ($11 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.5 (Radeon 535) vs 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) — the Radeon R7 250 offers 12.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 535 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon R7 250
MSRP	$100	$89-11%
Performance per Dollar	10.5	11.8+12%
Codename	Lexa	Oland
Release	April 20 2017	October 8 2013
Ranking	#668	#871

Search Radeon 535 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.