Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon 535
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Popular choices:
Radeon 535
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 535
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 535 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 620.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 535 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Radeon 535
Intel UHD Graphics 620
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.
Radeon 535
The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 scores 1,041 and the Radeon 535 reaches 1,049 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon 535 uses GCN 4.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 512 (Radeon 535). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,041 | 1,049 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 512+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+215% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1183 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 3 | 16+433% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 535 has 512 MB. The Radeon 535 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon 535's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 300W (Radeon 535). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 69.4+230% | 21.0 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon 535 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 costs 100+% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 10.5 (Radeon 535) — the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 10.5 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | Lexa |
| Release | September 1 2017 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #875 | #668 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Radeon 535
