Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon 535

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 620

2017Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 535

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon 535 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon 535: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon 535

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 535 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 535 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (1,049 vs 1,041), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 535 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 535 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon 535 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 620

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.

AMD

Radeon 535

The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 scores 1,041 and the Radeon 535 reaches 1,049 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon 535 uses GCN 4.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 512 (Radeon 535). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon 535
G3D Mark Score
1,041
1,049
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GCN 4.0
Process Node
14 nm++
14 nm
Shading Units
192
512+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.384 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+215%
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1183 MHz+18%
ROPs
3
16+433%
TMUs
24
32+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon 535
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 535 carries 512 MB. Radeon 535 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 620 and 64-bit on the Radeon 535.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon 535
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon 535's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 300W (Radeon 535). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon 535
TDP
15W-70%
50W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
300W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
69.4+230%
21.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 620 came in at $0, while the Radeon 535 launched at $100. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 620 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 10.5 (Radeon 535) — the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon 535
MSRP
$0-100%
$100
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
10.5
Codename
Kaby Lake GT2
Lexa
Release
September 1 2017
April 20 2017
Ranking
#875
#668

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.