Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 6750

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 620

2017Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6750

2011Boost: 900 MHz

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 6750 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 86W, a 71W reduction.
  • βœ…More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016βˆ’2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6750

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • βœ…Intel UHD Graphics 620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 6750 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌473.3% higher power demand at 86W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6750 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,046 vs 1,041), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6750 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 620

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6750

The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 scores 1,041 and the Radeon HD 6750 reaches 1,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 6750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 720 (Radeon HD 6750). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 6750
G3D Mark Score
1,041
1,046
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TeraScale 2
Process Node
14 nm++
40 nm
Shading Units
192
720+275%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.384 TFLOPS
1.008 TFLOPS+163%
Boost Clock
1000 MHz+11%
900 MHz
ROPs
3
16+433%
TMUs
24
36+50%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 6750
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6750 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 6750 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 620 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6750.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 6750
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
1 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 6750
DirectX
12+7%
11.2 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs None (Radeon HD 6750). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 6750
Encoder
QuickSync
None
Decoder
QuickSync
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 6750's 86W β€” a 140.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6750). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85Β°C vs 75.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 6750
TDP
15W-83%
86W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
450W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 6-pin
Length
β€”
170mm
Height
β€”
111mm
Slots
β€”
2
Temp (Load)
85Β°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
69.4+469%
12.2
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 620 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 6750 launched at $109. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 620 was 100+% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) β€” the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 6750
MSRP
$0-100%
$109
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
9.6
Codename
Kaby Lake GT2
Juniper
Release
September 1 2017
January 21 2011
Ranking
#875
#872

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.