UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 7670A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 7670A FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 7670A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7670A

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Intel UHD Graphics 620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 7670A is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7670A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (1,050 vs 1,041), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 7670A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7670A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 7670A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.

Radeon HD 7670A

The Radeon HD 7670A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,050 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 scores 1,041 and the Radeon HD 7670A reaches 1,050 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 7670A uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7670A). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670A).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon HD 7670A
G3D Mark Score	1,041	1,050
Architecture	Generation 9.5	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm++	40 nm
Shading Units	192	480+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.384 TFLOPS	0.576 TFLOPS+50%
ROPs	3	8+167%
TMUs	24	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon HD 7670A
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7670A carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 7670A gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 620 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7670A.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon HD 7670A
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 7670A's 45W — a 100% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7670A). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon HD 7670A
TDP	15W-67%	45W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 6-pin
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	69.4+198%	23.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 620 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 7670A launched at $100. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 620 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 10.5 (Radeon HD 7670A) — the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP	$0-100%	$100
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	10.5
Codename	Kaby Lake GT2	Turks
Release	September 1 2017	January 5 2012
Ranking	#875	#870

Search Intel UHD Graphics 620 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7670A on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.