Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 M465

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 620

2017Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M465

2016Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1125 MHz

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 M465 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 M465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $120 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M465

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 M465 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M465 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (1,059 vs 1,041), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 M465 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M465 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 M465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 620

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M465

The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 scores 1,041 and the Radeon R7 M465 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R7 M465 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M465). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1125 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon R7 M465
G3D Mark Score
1,041
1,059+2%
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GCN 3.0
Process Node
14 nm++
28 nm
Shading Units
192
384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.384 TFLOPS
0.864 TFLOPS+125%
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1125 MHz+13%
ROPs
3
8+167%
TMUs
24
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon R7 M465
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465 carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 M465 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 620 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon R7 M465
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M465). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon R7 M465
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs VCE 3.1 (Radeon R7 M465). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M465).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon R7 M465
Encoder
QuickSync
VCE 3.1
Decoder
QuickSync
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 M465's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon R7 M465
TDP
15W-80%
75W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
Mobile
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
69.4+392%
14.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 620 came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 M465 launched at $120. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 620 was 100+% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 8.8 (Radeon R7 M465) — the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon R7 M465
MSRP
$0-100%
$120
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
8.8
Codename
Kaby Lake GT2
Topaz
Release
September 1 2017
May 15 2016
Ranking
#875
#867

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.