UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 M465

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M465

#374

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1230%

#376

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1115%

#377

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1112%

#381

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1011%

#382

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1004%

#384

Radeon R7 M465

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

100%

#386

GeForce GT 640M LE

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

99%

#387

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#388

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

98%

#389

HD Graphics 520

MSRP: $100|Avg: $35

98%

#390

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

97%

#391

Radeon R9 M395X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $150

97%

#393

Radeon R9 M485X

MSRP: $450|Avg: $150

96%

#394

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

95%

#395

Radeon HD 6650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

#396

GeForce 920A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

94%

#397

GeForce 930A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

94%

#398

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 M465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 620.

Insight	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon R7 M465
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 M465 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 M465 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Radeon R7 M465

Intel UHD Graphics 620

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.

Radeon R7 M465

The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 scores 1,041 and the Radeon R7 M465 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R7 M465 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M465). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1125 MHz.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon R7 M465
G3D Mark Score	1,041	1,059+2%
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 3.0
Process Node	14 nm++	28 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.384 TFLOPS	0.864 TFLOPS+125%
Boost Clock	1000 MHz	1125 MHz+13%
ROPs	3	8+167%
TMUs	24	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon R7 M465
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465 has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 M465 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon R7 M465
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M465). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon R7 M465
DirectX	12	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs VCE 3.1 (Radeon R7 M465). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M465).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon R7 M465
Encoder	QuickSync	VCE 3.1
Decoder	QuickSync	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 M465's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon R7 M465
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	Mobile
Temp (Load)	85°C	85°C
Perf/Watt	69.4+392%	14.1

💰

Value Analysis

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R7 M465 launched at $120 and now averages $35. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 costs 100+% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 30.3 (Radeon R7 M465) — the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).