Firepro M4100
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Firepro M4100 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Firepro M4100 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Firepro M4100 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Firepro M4100
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics 620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Firepro M4100 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.
Intel UHD Graphics 620
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Firepro M4100 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Firepro M4100
The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 620
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro M4100 scores 1,059 and the Intel UHD Graphics 620 reaches 1,041 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro M4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 384 (Firepro M4100) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Raw compute: 0.5146 TFLOPS (Firepro M4100) vs 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,059+2% | 1,041 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5146 TFLOPS+34% | 0.384 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8+167% | 3 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro M4100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 carries 0 MB. Firepro M4100 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro M4100 and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 620.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro M4100) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Firepro M4100) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (Firepro M4100) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro M4100 draws 30W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 620's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro M4100) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 70mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.3 | 69.4+97% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Firepro M4100 came in at $0, while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Firepro M4100) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) — the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Mars | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | September 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #866 | #875 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Firepro M4100 and Intel UHD Graphics 620
