Intel UHD Graphics 620
Radeon R7 250
Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 250 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel UHD Graphics 620
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
Radeon R7 250
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics 620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 250 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel UHD Graphics 620
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.
Radeon R7 250
The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 scores 1,041 and the Radeon R7 250 reaches 1,051 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R7 250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 384 (Radeon R7 250). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,041 | 1,051 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 0.8064 TFLOPS+110% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 3 | 8+167% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250 carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 250 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 620 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 250). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+8% | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 250's 65W — a 125% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 300W (Radeon R7 250). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-77% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 69.4+328% | 16.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 620 came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 250 launched at $89. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 620 was 100+% cheaper ($89 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) — the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $89 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 11.8 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | Oland |
| Release | September 1 2017 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #875 | #871 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Radeon R7 250
