Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 8750M

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 620

2017Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8750M

2013Core: 670 MHzBoost: 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 8750M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 8750M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8750M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 8750M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8750M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (1,052 vs 1,041), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 8750M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8750M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 8750M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 620

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8750M

The Radeon HD 8750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 26 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 670 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 scores 1,041 and the Radeon HD 8750M reaches 1,052 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 8750M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8750M). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 0.5146 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8750M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 8750M
G3D Mark Score
1,041
1,052+1%
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm++
28 nm
Shading Units
192
384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.384 TFLOPS
0.5146 TFLOPS+34%
Boost Clock
1000 MHz+29%
775 MHz
ROPs
3
8+167%
TMUs
24
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 8750M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8750M carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 8750M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 620 and System on the Radeon HD 8750M.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 8750M
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8750M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 8750M
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8750M). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 8750M).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 8750M
Encoder
QuickSync
VCE 1.0
Decoder
QuickSync
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 8750M's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8750M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 8750M
TDP
15W-70%
50W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
69.4+230%
21.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 620Radeon HD 8750M
MSRP
$0
Codename
Kaby Lake GT2
Mars
Release
September 1 2017
February 26 2013
Ranking
#875
#869

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.