UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 8750M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8750M

#39

Radeon RX 7700S

MSRP: $449|Avg: $350

99%

#134

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

310%

#136

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

281%

#137

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

280%

#141

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

255%

#142

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

253%

#144

Radeon HD 8750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#145

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)

MSRP: $229|Avg: $65

100%

#147

GeForce GT 630M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35

99%

#150

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

97%

#157

GeForce 830M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

96%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

95%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 8750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 620.

Insight	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon HD 8750M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8750M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 8750M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 8750M

Intel UHD Graphics 620

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.

Radeon HD 8750M

The Radeon HD 8750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 26 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 670 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 scores 1,041 and the Radeon HD 8750M reaches 1,052 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 8750M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8750M). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 0.5146 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8750M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon HD 8750M
G3D Mark Score	1,041	1,052+1%
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm++	28 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.384 TFLOPS	0.5146 TFLOPS+34%
Boost Clock	1000 MHz+29%	775 MHz
ROPs	3	8+167%
TMUs	24	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon HD 8750M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8750M has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8750M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon HD 8750M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8750M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon HD 8750M
DirectX	12	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8750M). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 8750M).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Radeon HD 8750M
Encoder	QuickSync	VCE 1.0
Decoder	QuickSync	UVD 3.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 8750M's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8750M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.