Radeon HD 6970
VS
FirePro 3D V9800

Radeon HD 6970 vs FirePro 3D V9800

AMD

Radeon HD 6970

2010Boost: 880 MHz
VS

FirePro 3D V9800

2011Core: 725 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V9800

#349
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
18466%
#364
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
100%
#365
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
100%
#366
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
99%
#367
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
98%
#368
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
98%
#369
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
89%
#370
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
85%
#371
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
83%
#372
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
81%
#373
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
76%
#374
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
76%
#375
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
76%
#376
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
75%
#377
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
72%
#378
Quadro FX 4800
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80
70%
#379
Tesla M2090
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 6970 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V9800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 6970FirePro 3D V9800
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (286mm)
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro 3D V9800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V9800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $100), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 24.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 6970FirePro 3D V9800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+24.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)
More affordable ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6970 and FirePro 3D V9800

AMD

Radeon HD 6970

The Radeon HD 6970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,831 points. Launch price was $369.

AMD

FirePro 3D V9800

The FirePro 3D V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,812 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6970 scores 2,831 and the FirePro 3D V9800 reaches 2,812 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6970 is built on TeraScale 3 while the FirePro 3D V9800 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6970) vs 1,280 (FirePro 3D V9800). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V9800).

FeatureRadeon HD 6970FirePro 3D V9800
G3D Mark Score
2,831
2,812
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TeraScale 3
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1536+20%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.703 TFLOPS+46%
1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
96+20%
80
L1 Cache
192 KB
320 KB+67%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6970FirePro 3D V9800
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6970 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V9800 has 4 GB. The FirePro 3D V9800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 6970FirePro 3D V9800
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (Radeon HD 6970) vs 11.2 (FirePro 3D V9800). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon HD 6970FirePro 3D V9800
DirectX
11.0
11.2+2%
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
4.4
4.4
Max Displays
6
6
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6970) vs None (FirePro 3D V9800). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6970) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro 3D V9800).

FeatureRadeon HD 6970FirePro 3D V9800
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
UVD 3.0
UVD 2.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6970 draws 250W versus the FirePro 3D V9800's 150W — a 50% difference. The FirePro 3D V9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon HD 6970) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V9800). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 286mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 90.

FeatureRadeon HD 6970FirePro 3D V9800
TDP
250W
150W-40%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
286mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
90
90
Perf/Watt
11.3
18.7+65%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6970 launched at $369 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the FirePro 3D V9800 launched at $3499 and now averages $80. The FirePro 3D V9800 costs 20% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.3 (Radeon HD 6970) vs 35.1 (FirePro 3D V9800) — the FirePro 3D V9800 offers 24% better value. The FirePro 3D V9800 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 6970FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP
$369-89%
$3499
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$80-20%
Performance per Dollar
28.3
35.1+24%
Codename
Cayman
Cayman
Release
December 14 2010
May 24 2011
Ranking
#596
#656