
Radeon HD 6970 vs GRID M10-4Q

Radeon HD 6970
Popular choices:

GRID M10-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-4Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID M10-4Q is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The GRID M10-4Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6970 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6970.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6970 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (286mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6970 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6970 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $340), it costs 71% less, resulting in a 223.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6970 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+223.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($340) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6970 and GRID M10-4Q

Radeon HD 6970
The Radeon HD 6970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,831 points. Launch price was $369.

GRID M10-4Q
The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 6970 scores 2,831 versus the GRID M10-4Q's 2,977 — the GRID M10-4Q leads by 5.2%. The Radeon HD 6970 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GRID M10-4Q uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6970) vs 640 (GRID M10-4Q). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,831 | 2,977+5% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+140% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+62% | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 880 MHz | 1306 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+140% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6970) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6970 draws 250W versus the GRID M10-4Q's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID M10-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon HD 6970) vs 350W (GRID M10-4Q). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 225W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 286mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.3 | 13.2+17% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6970 launched at $369 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GRID M10-4Q launched at $2805 and now averages $340. The Radeon HD 6970 costs 70.6% less ($240 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.3 (Radeon HD 6970) vs 8.8 (GRID M10-4Q) — the Radeon HD 6970 offers 221.6% better value. The GRID M10-4Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $369-87% | $2805 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-71% | $340 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.3+222% | 8.8 |
| Codename | Cayman | GM107 |
| Release | December 14 2010 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #596 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















