Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 285 / 380

AMD

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

2011Core: 680 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014Core: 918 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 285 / 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 34.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.6 vs 27.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 190W, a 140W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 221mm, a 220mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 285 / 380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014

Why buy it

  • 50.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 32.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.9 vs 37.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 280% higher power demand at 190W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 50.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire instead at 5,637 vs 5,550, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 34.7% (37.6 vs 27.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 285 / 380 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,637 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 285 / 380

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire scores 5,637 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is built on Terascale 2 while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380).

FeatureRadeon HD 6970M CrossfireRadeon R9 285 / 380
G3D Mark Score
5,637+2%
5,550
Architecture
Terascale 2
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1920+7%
1792
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6970M CrossfireRadeon R9 285 / 380
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 115.2 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — a 52.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 285 / 380. Memory bus width is 256-bit x2 on the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285 / 380.

FeatureRadeon HD 6970M CrossfireRadeon R9 285 / 380
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
115.2 GB/s x2
176 GB/s+53%
Bus Width
256-bit x2
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon HD 6970M CrossfireRadeon R9 285 / 380
DirectX
11_0
12+9%
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 5.0.

FeatureRadeon HD 6970M CrossfireRadeon R9 285 / 380
Encoder
UVD 3
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 3
UVD 5.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 116.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 6970M CrossfireRadeon R9 285 / 380
TDP
50W-74%
190W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
1mm
221mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Perf/Watt
112.7+286%
29.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire came in at $150, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire was 24.6% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.6 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire offers 34.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 285 / 380 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6970M CrossfireRadeon R9 285 / 380
MSRP
$150-25%
$199
Performance per Dollar
37.6+35%
27.9
Codename
Blackcomb XT
Tonga
Release
January 6 2011
September 2 2014
Ranking
#537
#365

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.