
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

Radeon R9 285 / 380
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 285 / 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.6 vs 27.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 190W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 221mm, a 220mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 285 / 380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R9 285 / 380
2014Why buy it
- ✅50.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌32.7% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.9 vs 37.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌280% higher power demand at 190W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,637 points.

Radeon R9 285 / 380
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire scores 5,637 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is built on Terascale 2 while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,637+2% | 5,550 |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+7% | 1792 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 115.2 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — a 52.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 285 / 380. Memory bus width is 256-bit x2 on the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285 / 380.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s x2 | 176 GB/s+53% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2 | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12+9% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 5.0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 116.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 112.7+286% | 29.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire came in at $150, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire was 24.6% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.6 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire offers 34.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 285 / 380 (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-25% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.6+35% | 27.9 |
| Codename | Blackcomb XT | Tonga |
| Release | January 6 2011 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #537 | #365 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















