GRID P40-4Q vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-4Q vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P40-4Q vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-4Q

2013

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1900% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 37.6 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,850 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1802.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P40-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.1% in PassMark G3D (5,926 vs 5,637), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P40-4Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,850 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1802.5% (37.6 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P40-4Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P40-4Q vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-4Q

The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,637 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GRID P40-4Q scores 5,926 versus the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire's 5,637 — the GRID P40-4Q leads by 5.1%. The GRID P40-4Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 1,920 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire).

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
G3D Mark Score	5,926+5%	5,637
Architecture	Kepler	Terascale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536	1920+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-4Q and 256-bit x2 on the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit x2+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 11_0 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
DirectX	12_1+9%	11_0
Max Displays	0	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-4Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-4Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	1mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	26.3	112.7+329%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P40-4Q came in at $3000, while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire was 95% cheaper ($2850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 37.6 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) — the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire offers 1780% better value. The newer card here is GRID P40-4Q (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
MSRP	$3000	$150-95%
Performance per Dollar	2.0	37.6+1780%
Codename	GK104	Blackcomb XT
Release	June 28 2013	January 6 2011
Ranking	#628	#537

Search GRID P40-4Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.