
GRID P40-4Q vs Radeon R9 380

GRID P40-4Q
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P40-4Q is positioned at rank #294 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-4Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-4Q.
| Insight | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 380 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 380 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $150), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 203.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+203.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-4Q and Radeon R9 380

GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-4Q scores 5,926 and the Radeon R9 380 reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-4Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,926 | 6,000+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1792+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 3.476 TFLOPS+52% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 448 KB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-4Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 2.2% difference. The Radeon R9 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-4Q) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 220W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.3 | 27.3+4% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R9 380 launched at $199 and now averages $50. The Radeon R9 380 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.5 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 120.0 (Radeon R9 380) — the Radeon R9 380 offers 203.8% better value. The Radeon R9 380 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $199-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $50-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5 | 120.0+204% |
| Codename | GK104 | Antigua |
| Release | June 28 2013 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #628 | #396 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















