GRID P40-4Q vs Radeon Pro 5300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-4Q vs Radeon Pro 5300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

No benchmark data available yet.

Check FPS with Custom Builds

GRID P40-4Q vs Radeon Pro 5300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-4Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌164.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 85W.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅GRID P40-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 5300M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 85W instead of 225W, a 140W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P40-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (5,926 vs 5,853), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 5300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P40-4Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P40-4Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 5300M has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P40-4Q vs Radeon Pro 5300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-4Q

The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-4Q scores 5,926 and the Radeon Pro 5300M reaches 5,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-4Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M).

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	Radeon Pro 5300M
G3D Mark Score	5,926+1%	5,853
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1536+20%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS+40%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+60%	80
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	Radeon Pro 5300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-4Q and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5300M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-4Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	Radeon Pro 5300M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	Radeon Pro 5300M
DirectX	12_1	12.1
Max Displays	0	4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-4Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 90.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-4Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	Radeon Pro 5300M
TDP	225W	85W-62%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	26.3	68.9+162%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5300M (2019 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	Radeon Pro 5300M
MSRP	$3000	—
Codename	GK104	Navi 14
Release	June 28 2013	November 13 2019
Ranking	#628	#403

Search GRID P40-4Q on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 5300M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.