GRID P40-4Q
Intel Arc Pro A30M
GRID P40-4Q vs Intel Arc Pro A30M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P40-4Q vs Intel Arc Pro A30M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID P40-4Q vs Intel Arc Pro A30M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P40-4Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-4Q vs Intel Arc Pro A30M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-4Q scores 5,926 and the Intel Arc Pro A30M reaches 5,862 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-4Q is built on Kepler while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,926+1% | 5,862 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+79% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-4Q and System on the Intel Arc Pro A30M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-4Q) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-4Q draws 225W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-4Q) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.3 | 117.2+346% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro A30M (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | DG2-128 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | August 8 2022 |
| Ranking | #628 | #402 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P40-4Q and Intel Arc Pro A30M
