GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs GRID P40-4Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

2020Core: 1350 MHzBoost: 1485 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS

GRID P40-4Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs GRID P40-4Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs GRID P40-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

  • GRID P40-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).

GRID P40-4Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P40-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (5,926 vs 5,918), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-4Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P40-4Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs GRID P40-4Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,918 points.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-4Q

The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) scores 5,918 and the GRID P40-4Q reaches 5,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the GRID P40-4Q uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)GRID P40-4Q
G3D Mark Score
5,918
5,926
Architecture
Turing
Kepler
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
1536+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.041 TFLOPS+33%
2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
128+100%
L1 Cache
1 MB+669%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P40-4Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)GRID P40-4Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) and 128-bit on the GRID P40-4Q. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 0.5 MB (GRID P40-4Q) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)GRID P40-4Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)GRID P40-4Q
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12_1
Max Displays
4
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the GRID P40-4Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 350W (GRID P40-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)GRID P40-4Q
TDP
50W-78%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
118.4+350%
26.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)GRID P40-4Q
MSRP
$3000
Codename
TU116
GK104
Release
April 23 2020
June 28 2013
Ranking
#324
#628

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.