
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

Radeon R9 380
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 380 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅5.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Radeon R9 380 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,918 points.

Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) scores 5,918 and the Radeon R9 380 reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,918 | 6,000+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1792+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.041 TFLOPS | 3.476 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 1485 MHz+53% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+127% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 380 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 182.4 GB/s (Radeon R9 380) — a 62.9% advantage for the Radeon R9 380. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 380. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 182.4 GB/s+63% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon R9 380).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 125.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-77% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 118.4+334% | 27.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Codename | TU116 | Antigua |
| Release | April 23 2020 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #324 | #396 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















