GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
VS
Radeon Pro 5300M

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro 5300M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

2020Core: 1350 MHzBoost: 1485 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is positioned at rank 28 and the Radeon Pro 5300M is on rank 18, so the Radeon Pro 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

#18
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
156%
#20
141%
#21
141%
#25
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
128%
#26
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
127%
#28
100%
#35
GeForce GTX 960M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
97%
#37
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5300M

#3
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
252%
#18
Radeon Pro 5300M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
76%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
68%
#33
Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $200
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5300M.

InsightGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon Pro 5300M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) and Radeon Pro 5300M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,918 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) scores 5,918 and the Radeon Pro 5300M reaches 5,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon Pro 5300M
G3D Mark Score
5,918+1%
5,853
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1024
1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.041 TFLOPS
3.2 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock
1485 MHz+19%
1250 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
80+25%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon Pro 5300M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon Pro 5300M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon Pro 5300M
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon Pro 5300M
Encoder
NVENC (6th Gen)
VCN 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
VCN 2.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 51.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon Pro 5300M
TDP
50W-41%
85W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
118.4+72%
68.9