GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro 5300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro 5300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro 5300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

✅28.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 28.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (5,918 vs 5,853), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 5300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 5300M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro 5300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,918 points.

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) scores 5,918 and the Radeon Pro 5300M reaches 5,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon Pro 5300M
G3D Mark Score	5,918+1%	5,853
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1024	1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.041 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock	1485 MHz+19%	1250 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	80+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5300M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon Pro 5300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5300M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon Pro 5300M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon Pro 5300M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon Pro 5300M
Encoder	NVENC (6th Gen)	VCN 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (3rd Gen)	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 51.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.