
GRID P40-4Q vs Radeon R9 280X

GRID P40-4Q
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 280X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P40-4Q is positioned at rank #294 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-4Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID P40-4Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 280X holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $150), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 157.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+157.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-4Q and Radeon R9 280X

GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-4Q scores 5,926 and the Radeon R9 280X reaches 6,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-4Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,926 | 6,100+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+79% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-4Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280X has 3 GB. The GRID P40-4Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID P40-4Q) vs 768 KB (Radeon R9 280X) — the Radeon R9 280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-4Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 280X's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon R9 280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-4Q) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 200W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.3 | 30.5+16% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R9 280X launched at $299 and now averages $60. The Radeon R9 280X costs 60% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.5 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 101.7 (Radeon R9 280X) — the Radeon R9 280X offers 157.5% better value.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $299-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $60-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5 | 101.7+157% |
| Codename | GK104 | Tahiti |
| Release | June 28 2013 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #628 | #404 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















