GRID P40-4Q vs RTX A400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-4Q vs RTX A400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P40-4Q vs RTX A400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-4Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2122.2% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,865 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2143.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX A400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (5,983 vs 5,926), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,865 cheaper on MSRP at $135 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2143.6% (44.3 vs 2.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID P40-4Q vs RTX A400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-4Q

The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

RTX A400

The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-4Q scores 5,926 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-4Q is built on Kepler while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400).

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	RTX A400
G3D Mark Score	5,926	5,983
Architecture	Kepler	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1536+100%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS	2.706 TFLOPS+18%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+433%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P40-4Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	RTX A400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-4Q and 128-bit on the RTX A400.

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	RTX A400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-4Q draws 225W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-4Q) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	RTX A400
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	26.3	119.7+355%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P40-4Q came in at $3000, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. On MSRP, RTX A400 was 95.5% cheaper ($2865 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 2115% better value. The newer card here is RTX A400 (2024 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID P40-4Q	RTX A400
MSRP	$3000	$135-96%
Performance per Dollar	2.0	44.3+2115%
Codename	GK104	GA107
Release	June 28 2013	April 16 2024
Ranking	#628	#397

Search GRID P40-4Q on Amazon

Search RTX A400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.