
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:

RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 177.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A400.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+177.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-177.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $135), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 49.7% better value per dollar than the RTX A400.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+49.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($135) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and RTX A400

Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the RTX A400's 5,983 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 177.1%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600) vs 6 (RTX A400) vs 24.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+177% | 5,983 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+704% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+51% | 1762 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+433% | 6 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A400 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A400 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 107% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 50W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5 | 119.7+19% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the RTX A400 launched at $135 and now averages $135. The RTX A400 costs 46% less ($115 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 49.7% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | $135-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $135-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+50% | 44.3 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GA107 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #118 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















