GeForce RTX 3070 vs RTX A400
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 270.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A400.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+270.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-270.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $135), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 150.1% better value per dollar than the RTX A400.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+150.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($135) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX A400
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX A400's 5,983 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 270.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6 (RTX A400) with 184 Tensor cores vs 24.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+271% | 5,983 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+667% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+651% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1762 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+667% | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+667% | 6 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+667% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX A400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A400 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 125.9% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 119.7+19% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the RTX A400 launched at $135 and now averages $135. The RTX A400 costs 32.5% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 150.3% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $135-73% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $135-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+150% | 44.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | GA107 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #63 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX A400
