GRID P40-4Q vs GeForce MX570
GRID P40-4Q
Popular choices:
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P40-4Q is positioned at rank 294 and the GeForce MX570 is on rank 117, so the GeForce MX570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-4Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX570 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The GeForce MX570 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P40-4Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570.
| Insight | GRID P40-4Q | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $150 for the GRID P40-4Q, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 21% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-4Q | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+21%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-4Q and GeForce MX570
GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-4Q scores 5,926 and the GeForce MX570 reaches 5,738 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-4Q is built on Kepler while the GeForce MX570 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,926+3% | 5,738 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+107% |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2 MB+1438% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-4Q) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX570) — the GeForce MX570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-4Q draws 225W versus the GeForce MX570's 25W — a 160% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-4Q) vs 350W (GeForce MX570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 25W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.3 | 229.5+773% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce MX570 launched at $150 and now averages $120. The GeForce MX570 costs 20% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.5 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 47.8 (GeForce MX570) — the GeForce MX570 offers 21% better value. The GeForce MX570 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $150-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $120-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5 | 47.8+21% |
| Codename | GK104 | GA107 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #628 | #407 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P40-4Q and GeForce MX570
