
Quadro M3000M

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Quadro M3000M vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M3000M vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M3000M vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M3000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅32.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M3000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M3000M vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M3000M
The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,637 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M3000M scores 5,574 and the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire reaches 5,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M3000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M3000M) vs 1,920 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire).
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,574 | 5,637+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,024 | 1920+88% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Quadro M3000M and 256-bit x2 on the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit x2+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M) vs 11_0 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M3000M) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M3000M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 74.3 | 112.7+52% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro M3000M (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Codename | GM204 | Blackcomb XT |
| Release | August 18 2015 | January 6 2011 |
| Ranking | #411 | #537 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















