Quadro M3000M vs Radeon PRO W6300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M3000M vs Radeon PRO W6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M3000M vs Radeon PRO W6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M3000M

2015

Why buy it

✅4.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M3000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M3000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (5,574 vs 5,560), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W6300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro M3000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M3000M vs Radeon PRO W6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M3000M

The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M3000M scores 5,574 and the Radeon PRO W6300 reaches 5,560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M3000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M3000M) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 2.15 TFLOPS (Quadro M3000M) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300).

Feature	Quadro M3000M	Radeon PRO W6300
G3D Mark Score	5,574	5,560
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1,024+33%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.15 TFLOPS	3.133 TFLOPS+46%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M3000M	Radeon PRO W6300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M3000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 carries 2 GB. Quadro M3000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Quadro M3000M and 128-bit on the Radeon PRO W6300. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M3000M) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Quadro M3000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M3000M	Radeon PRO W6300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 100% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M3000M) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro M3000M	Radeon PRO W6300
TDP	75W	25W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	74.3	222.4+199%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6300 (2022 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro M3000M	Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP	—	$200
Codename	GM204	Navi 24
Release	August 18 2015	January 19 2022
Ranking	#411	#413

Search Quadro M3000M on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W6300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.