
GRID P40-4Q

Quadro M3000M
GRID P40-4Q vs Quadro M3000M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P40-4Q vs Quadro M3000M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID P40-4Q vs Quadro M3000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P40-4Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Quadro M3000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-4Q vs Quadro M3000M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

Quadro M3000M
The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GRID P40-4Q scores 5,926 versus the Quadro M3000M's 5,574 — the GRID P40-4Q leads by 6.3%. The GRID P40-4Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro M3000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 1 (Quadro M3000M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Quadro M3000M).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,926+6% | 5,574 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1,024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+6% | 2.15 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 384 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-4Q and 128-bit on the Quadro M3000M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-4Q) vs 2 MB (Quadro M3000M) — the Quadro M3000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-4Q draws 225W versus the Quadro M3000M's 75W — a 100% difference. The Quadro M3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-4Q) vs 350W (Quadro M3000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.3 | 74.3+183% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro M3000M (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | GM204 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #628 | #411 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















