Quadro M3000M vs Radeon TM

NVIDIA

Quadro M3000M

2015Core: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon TM

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro M3000M vs Radeon TM Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M3000M vs Radeon TM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M3000M vs Radeon TM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M3000M

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon TM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon TM

2024

Why buy it

  • 8.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon TM is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M3000M instead at 5,574 vs 5,564, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon TM is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon TM makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro M3000M vs Radeon TM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M3000M

The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.

AMD

Radeon TM

The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M3000M scores 5,574 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M3000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M3000M) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 2.15 TFLOPS (Quadro M3000M) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM).

FeatureQuadro M3000MRadeon TM
G3D Mark Score
5,574
5,564
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1,024
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.15 TFLOPS
5.939 TFLOPS+176%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
64
L1 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M3000MRadeon TM
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Quadro M3000M and 128-bit on the Radeon TM.

FeatureQuadro M3000MRadeon TM
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M3000M) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro M3000MRadeon TM
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
74.3
370.9+399%