
Radeon HD 6990 vs GeForce GTX 860M

Radeon HD 6990
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 860M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 860M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 860M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6990.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6990 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (310mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 860M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 860M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $498), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 922.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6990 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+922.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($498) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6990 and GeForce GTX 860M

Radeon HD 6990
The Radeon HD 6990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,014 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce GTX 860M
The GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1152 or 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,095 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6990 scores 3,014 and the GeForce GTX 860M reaches 3,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6990 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GTX 860M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6990) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 860M). Raw compute: 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6990) vs 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 860M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,014 | 3,095+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 ×2+33% | 1152 or 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.55 TFLOPS ×2+84% | 1.389 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96 ×2+140% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+20% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6990) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 860M) — the GeForce GTX 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 6990) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 860M). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+2% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5+2% |
| Max Displays | 5+400% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6990) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 860M). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6990) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GTX 860M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6990 draws 375W versus the GeForce GTX 860M's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon HD 6990) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 860M). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 310mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 75W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 350W-53% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 310mm | 0mm |
| Height | 115mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 8.0 | 41.3+416% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 860M costs 90% less ($448 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.1 (Radeon HD 6990) vs 61.9 (GeForce GTX 860M) — the GeForce GTX 860M offers 914.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 860M is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990 | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $498 | $50-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 61.9+915% |
| Codename | Antilles | GM107 |
| Release | March 8 2011 | January 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #583 | #578 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















