Radeon HD 6990
VS
Radeon Pro 555X

Radeon HD 6990 vs Radeon Pro 555X

AMD

Radeon HD 6990

2011Core: 830 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 555X

2018Core: 907 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro 555X is significantly newer (2018 vs 2011). The Radeon Pro 555X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6990 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 6990 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 555X.

InsightRadeon HD 6990Radeon Pro 555X
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (310mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 6990 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $498 versus $1,049 for the Radeon Pro 555X, it costs 53% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 111.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 6990Radeon Pro 555X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+111.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($498)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,049)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6990 and Radeon Pro 555X

AMD

Radeon HD 6990

The Radeon HD 6990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,014 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

Radeon Pro 555X

The Radeon Pro 555X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6990 scores 3,014 and the Radeon Pro 555X reaches 3,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6990 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon Pro 555X uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6990) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555X). Raw compute: 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6990) vs 1.393 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555X).

FeatureRadeon HD 6990Radeon Pro 555X
G3D Mark Score
3,014
3,000
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536 ×2+100%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.55 TFLOPS ×2+83%
1.393 TFLOPS
ROPs
32 ×2+100%
16
TMUs
96 ×2+100%
48
L1 Cache
384 KB+100%
192 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6990Radeon Pro 555X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6990) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555X) — the Radeon Pro 555X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6990Radeon Pro 555X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6990 draws 375W versus the Radeon Pro 555X's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 555X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon HD 6990) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555X). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6990Radeon Pro 555X
TDP
375W
75W-80%
Recommended PSU
750W
350W-53%
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
310mm
Height
115mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
8.0
40.0+400%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6990 launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $498, while the Radeon Pro 555X launched at $0 and now averages $1049. The Radeon HD 6990 costs 52.5% less ($551 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.1 (Radeon HD 6990) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro 555X) — the Radeon HD 6990 offers 110.3% better value. The Radeon Pro 555X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6990Radeon Pro 555X
MSRP
$699
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$498-53%
$1049
Performance per Dollar
6.1+110%
2.9
Codename
Antilles
Polaris 21
Release
March 8 2011
July 16 2018
Ranking
#583
#564