
GRID M10-4Q vs Radeon HD 6990

GRID M10-4Q
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6990
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M10-4Q is positioned at rank #344 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-4Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6990 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-4Q.
| Insight | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (310mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M10-4Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M10-4Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $340 (vs $498), it costs 32% less, resulting in a 44.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+44.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($340) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($498) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-4Q and Radeon HD 6990

GRID M10-4Q
The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.

Radeon HD 6990
The Radeon HD 6990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,014 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-4Q scores 2,977 and the Radeon HD 6990 reaches 3,014 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-4Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6990 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-4Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6990). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6990).
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,977 | 3,014+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1536 ×2+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS | 2.55 TFLOPS ×2+53% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 96 ×2+140% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 384 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6990) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-4Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6990's 375W — a 50% difference. The GRID M10-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-4Q) vs 750W (Radeon HD 6990). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin.
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-40% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 310mm |
| Height | — | 115mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.2+65% | 8.0 |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-4Q launched at $2805 MSRP and currently averages $340, while the Radeon HD 6990 launched at $699 and now averages $498. The GRID M10-4Q costs 31.7% less ($158 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.8 (GRID M10-4Q) vs 6.1 (Radeon HD 6990) — the GRID M10-4Q offers 44.3% better value. The GRID M10-4Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | GRID M10-4Q | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2805 | $699-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $340-32% | $498 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.8+44% | 6.1 |
| Codename | GM107 | Antilles |
| Release | May 18 2016 | March 8 2011 |
| Ranking | #622 | #583 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















