GRID M10-4Q vs Radeon Pro 555X

GRID M10-4Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 555X

2018Core: 907 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID M10-4Q vs Radeon Pro 555X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-4Q vs Radeon Pro 555X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-4Q

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,805 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro 555X

2018

Why buy it

  • GRID M10-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 555X is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 555X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (3,000 vs 2,977), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 555X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M10-4Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID M10-4Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 555X has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-4Q vs Radeon Pro 555X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-4Q

The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 555X

The Radeon Pro 555X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-4Q scores 2,977 and the Radeon Pro 555X reaches 3,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-4Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro 555X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-4Q) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555X). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q) vs 1.393 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555X).

FeatureGRID M10-4QRadeon Pro 555X
G3D Mark Score
2,977
3,000
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640
768+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.672 TFLOPS+20%
1.393 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
48+20%
L1 Cache
320 KB+67%
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M10-4QRadeon Pro 555X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-4Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 555X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555X) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M10-4QRadeon Pro 555X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-4Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 555X's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro 555X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-4Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID M10-4QRadeon Pro 555X
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
13.2
40.0+203%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-4Q came in at $2805, while the Radeon Pro 555X launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 555X was 100+% cheaper ($2805 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (GRID M10-4Q) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 555X) — the Radeon Pro 555X offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 555X (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureGRID M10-4QRadeon Pro 555X
MSRP
$2805
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
1.1
Infinity
Codename
GM107
Polaris 21
Release
May 18 2016
July 16 2018
Ranking
#622
#564

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.