GRID M10-4Q vs Tesla C2075

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-4Q vs Tesla C2075 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-4Q vs Tesla C2075: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-4Q

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,805 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla C2075

2011

Why buy it

✅GRID M10-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tesla C2075 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla C2075 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (3,017 vs 2,977), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Tesla C2075 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M10-4Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID M10-4Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Tesla C2075 has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-4Q vs Tesla C2075 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-4Q

The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.

Tesla C2075

The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-4Q scores 2,977 and the Tesla C2075 reaches 3,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-4Q is built on Maxwell while the Tesla C2075 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-4Q) vs 448 (Tesla C2075). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075).

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Tesla C2075
G3D Mark Score	2,977	3,017+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640+43%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS+63%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	40	56+40%
L1 Cache	320 KB	896 KB+180%
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Tesla C2075
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-4Q and 64-bit on the Tesla C2075. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2075) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Tesla C2075
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-4Q draws 225W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 9.3% difference. The GRID M10-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-4Q) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Tesla C2075
TDP	225W-9%	247W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	13.2+8%	12.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-4Q came in at $2805, while the Tesla C2075 launched at $0. On MSRP, Tesla C2075 was 100+% cheaper ($2805 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (GRID M10-4Q) vs Infinity (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-4Q (2016 vs 2011).

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Tesla C2075
MSRP	$2805	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	1.1	Infinity
Codename	GM107	GF110
Release	May 18 2016	July 25 2011
Ranking	#622	#553

Search GRID M10-4Q on Amazon

Search Tesla C2075 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.