GRID M10-4Q vs Radeon R7 260

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-4Q vs Radeon R7 260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-4Q vs Radeon R7 260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-4Q

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2473.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,805 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 26.5 G3D/$ ($2,805 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌136.8% higher power demand at 225W vs 95W.

Radeon R7 260

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,696 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2399.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.5 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 225W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M10-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (2,977 vs 2,892), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-4Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 260 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,696 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $2,805, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2399.9% (26.5 vs 1.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 260 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-4Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-4Q vs Radeon R7 260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-4Q

The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.

Radeon R7 260

The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-4Q scores 2,977 and the Radeon R7 260 reaches 2,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-4Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-4Q) vs 768 (Radeon R7 260). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Radeon R7 260
G3D Mark Score	2,977+3%	2,892
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	768+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS+9%	1.536 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1306 MHz+19%	1100 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	48+20%
L1 Cache	320 KB+67%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Radeon R7 260
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-4Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 260 carries 1 GB. GRID M10-4Q gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-4Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Radeon R7 260
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-4Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 260's 95W — a 81.3% difference. The Radeon R7 260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-4Q) vs 400W (Radeon R7 260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Radeon R7 260
TDP	225W	95W-58%
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	13.2	30.4+130%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-4Q came in at $2805, while the Radeon R7 260 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon R7 260 was 96.1% cheaper ($2696 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (GRID M10-4Q) vs 26.5 (Radeon R7 260) — the Radeon R7 260 offers 2309.1% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-4Q (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Radeon R7 260
MSRP	$2805	$109-96%
Performance per Dollar	1.1	26.5+2309%
Codename	GM107	Bonaire
Release	May 18 2016	December 17 2013
Ranking	#622	#591

Search GRID M10-4Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.