GRID M10-4Q vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-4Q vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-4Q vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-4Q

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,805 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1025% higher power demand at 225W vs 20W.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

2024

Why buy it

✅GRID M10-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 20W instead of 225W, a 205W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (3,000 vs 2,977), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M10-4Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID M10-4Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-4Q vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-4Q

The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in September 3 2024. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-4Q scores 2,977 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS reaches 3,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-4Q) vs 768 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS).

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
G3D Mark Score	2,977	3,000
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	640	768+20%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-4Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS carries 0 MB. GRID M10-4Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-4Q and System on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS.

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-4Q draws 225W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS's 20W — a 167.3% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-4Q) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
TDP	225W	20W-91%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	13.2	150.0+1036%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-4Q came in at $2805, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS launched at $0. On MSRP, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS was 100+% cheaper ($2805 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (GRID M10-4Q) vs Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (2024 vs 2016).

Feature	GRID M10-4Q	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
MSRP	$2805	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	1.1	Infinity
Codename	GM107	—
Release	May 18 2016	September 3 2024
Ranking	#622	#636

Search GRID M10-4Q on Amazon

Search Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.