GRID K260Q vs GRID M10-4Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K260Q vs GRID M10-4Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K260Q vs GRID M10-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K260Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,868 less on MSRP ($937 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
✅Delivers 196.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.1 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($937 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M10-4Q

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
199.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,805 MSRPvs$937 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 3.1 G3D/$ ($2,805 MSRP vs $937 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M10-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (2,977 vs 2,949), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K260Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K260Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,868 cheaper on MSRP at $937 vs $2,805, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 196.5% (3.1 vs 1.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID M10-4Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID K260Q vs GRID M10-4Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K260Q

The GRID K260Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,949 points. Launch price was $937.

GRID M10-4Q

The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K260Q scores 2,949 and the GRID M10-4Q reaches 2,977 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K260Q is built on Kepler while the GRID M10-4Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K260Q) vs 640 (GRID M10-4Q). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K260Q) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q).

Feature	GRID K260Q	GRID M10-4Q
G3D Mark Score	2,949	2,977
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+140%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+37%	1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+220%	40
L1 Cache	128 KB	320 KB+150%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K260Q	GRID M10-4Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K260Q and 64-bit on the GRID M10-4Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K260Q) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K260Q	GRID M10-4Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K260Q draws 225W versus the GRID M10-4Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID M10-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K260Q) vs 350W (GRID M10-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K260Q	GRID M10-4Q
TDP	225W	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	13.1	13.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K260Q came in at $937, while the GRID M10-4Q launched at $2805. On MSRP, GRID K260Q was 66.6% cheaper ($1868 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.1 (GRID K260Q) vs 1.1 (GRID M10-4Q) — the GRID K260Q offers 181.8% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-4Q (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K260Q	GRID M10-4Q
MSRP	$937-67%	$2805
Performance per Dollar	3.1+182%	1.1
Codename	GK104	GM107
Release	June 28 2013	May 18 2016
Ranking	#589	#622

Search GRID K260Q on Amazon

Search GRID M10-4Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.