GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K260Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($937 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅GRID K260Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $937 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K260Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.4% in PassMark G3D (2,949 vs 2,853), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K260Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID K260Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K260Q

The GRID K260Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,949 points. Launch price was $937.

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,853 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K260Q scores 2,949 and the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU reaches 2,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K260Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K260Q) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K260Q) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU).

Feature	GRID K260Q	Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	2,949+3%	2,853
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 5.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536	3584 ×2+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS ×2+370%
ROPs	32	64 ×2+100%
TMUs	128	224 ×2+75%
L1 Cache	128 KB	896 KB+600%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K260Q	Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K260Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K260Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K260Q	Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K260Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU's 300W — a 28.6% difference. The GRID K260Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K260Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K260Q	Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
TDP	225W-25%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	13.1+38%	9.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K260Q	Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
MSRP	$937	—
Codename	GK104	Vega 10
Release	June 28 2013	August 26 2018
Ranking	#589	#592

Search GRID K260Q on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.