GRID K260Q
Quadro M1000M
GRID K260Q vs Quadro M1000M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K260Q vs Quadro M1000M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID K260Q vs Quadro M1000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K260Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($937 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌462.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 40W.
Quadro M1000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 225W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $937 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K260Q vs Quadro M1000M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID K260Q
The GRID K260Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,949 points. Launch price was $937.
Quadro M1000M
The Quadro M1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,845 points. Launch price was $200.89.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K260Q scores 2,949 and the Quadro M1000M reaches 2,845 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K260Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro M1000M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K260Q) vs 512 (Quadro M1000M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K260Q) vs 1.017 TFLOPS (Quadro M1000M).
| Feature | GRID K260Q | Quadro M1000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,949+4% | 2,845 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+200% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+125% | 1.017 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K260Q | Quadro M1000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K260Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M1000M carries 4 GB. Quadro M1000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K260Q and 64-bit on the Quadro M1000M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K260Q) vs 2 MB (Quadro M1000M) — the Quadro M1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K260Q | Quadro M1000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K260Q draws 225W versus the Quadro M1000M's 40W — a 139.6% difference. The Quadro M1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K260Q) vs 350W (Quadro M1000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K260Q | Quadro M1000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 40W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1 | 71.1+443% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro M1000M (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K260Q | Quadro M1000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $937 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | GM107 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #589 | #594 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M
