GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro 555X
GRID K260Q
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 555X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID K260Q is positioned at rank #247 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K260Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 555X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 555X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID K260Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 555X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K260Q.
| Insight | GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 555X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID K260Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $1,049 for the Radeon Pro 555X, it costs 99% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 6774.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 555X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6774.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,049) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro 555X
GRID K260Q
The GRID K260Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,949 points. Launch price was $937.
Radeon Pro 555X
The Radeon Pro 555X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K260Q scores 2,949 and the Radeon Pro 555X reaches 3,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K260Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 555X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K260Q) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555X). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K260Q) vs 1.393 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555X).
| Feature | GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 555X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,949 | 3,000+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+100% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+64% | 1.393 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 555X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K260Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555X) — the Radeon Pro 555X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 555X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K260Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 555X's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro 555X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K260Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 555X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1 | 40.0+205% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K260Q launched at $937 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon Pro 555X launched at $0 and now averages $1049. The GRID K260Q costs 98.6% less ($1034 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 196.6 (GRID K260Q) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro 555X) — the GRID K260Q offers 6679.3% better value. The Radeon Pro 555X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 555X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $937 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-99% | $1049 |
| Performance per Dollar | 196.6+6679% | 2.9 |
| Codename | GK104 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | July 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #589 | #564 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro 555X
