GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro 555X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro 555X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro 555X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K260Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($937 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro 555X

2018

Why buy it

✅GRID K260Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 555X is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $937 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 555X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (3,000 vs 2,949), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 555X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K260Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID K260Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 555X has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro 555X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K260Q

The GRID K260Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,949 points. Launch price was $937.

Radeon Pro 555X

The Radeon Pro 555X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K260Q scores 2,949 and the Radeon Pro 555X reaches 3,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K260Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 555X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K260Q) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555X). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K260Q) vs 1.393 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555X).

Feature	GRID K260Q	Radeon Pro 555X
G3D Mark Score	2,949	3,000+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536+100%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+64%	1.393 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	128 KB	192 KB+50%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K260Q	Radeon Pro 555X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K260Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 555X. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K260Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555X) — the Radeon Pro 555X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K260Q	Radeon Pro 555X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K260Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 555X's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro 555X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K260Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K260Q	Radeon Pro 555X
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	13.1	40.0+205%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K260Q came in at $937, while the Radeon Pro 555X launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 555X was 100+% cheaper ($937 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.1 (GRID K260Q) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 555X) — the Radeon Pro 555X offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 555X (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K260Q	Radeon Pro 555X
MSRP	$937	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	3.1	Infinity
Codename	GK104	Polaris 21
Release	June 28 2013	July 16 2018
Ranking	#589	#564

Search GRID K260Q on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 555X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.