FirePro W5000 vs GRID M10-4Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W5000 vs GRID M10-4Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W5000 vs GRID M10-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W5000

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,206 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
✅Delivers 366.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M10-4Q

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
368.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,805 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($2,805 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M10-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (2,977 vs 2,967), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro W5000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,206 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $2,805, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 366.7% (5.0 vs 1.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID M10-4Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro W5000 vs GRID M10-4Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W5000

The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.

GRID M10-4Q

The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W5000 scores 2,967 and the GRID M10-4Q reaches 2,977 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M10-4Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W5000) vs 640 (GRID M10-4Q). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro W5000) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q).

Feature	FirePro W5000	GRID M10-4Q
G3D Mark Score	2,967	2,977
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+20%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.267 TFLOPS	1.672 TFLOPS+32%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+20%	40
L1 Cache	192 KB	320 KB+67%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W5000	GRID M10-4Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W5000 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-4Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W5000) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W5000	GRID M10-4Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W5000 draws 75W versus the GRID M10-4Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The FirePro W5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5000) vs 350W (GRID M10-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro W5000	GRID M10-4Q
TDP	75W-67%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	183mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	39.6+200%	13.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W5000 came in at $599, while the GRID M10-4Q launched at $2805. On MSRP, FirePro W5000 was 78.6% cheaper ($2206 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (FirePro W5000) vs 1.1 (GRID M10-4Q) — the FirePro W5000 offers 354.5% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-4Q (2016 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro W5000	GRID M10-4Q
MSRP	$599-79%	$2805
Performance per Dollar	5.0+355%	1.1
Codename	Pitcairn	GM107
Release	August 7 2012	May 18 2016
Ranking	#585	#622

Search FirePro W5000 on Amazon

Search GRID M10-4Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.