FirePro W5000
VS
Radeon R9 360

FirePro W5000 vs Radeon R9 360

FirePro W5000

2012Core: 825 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W5000 is positioned at rank 216 and the Radeon R9 360 is on rank 179, so the Radeon R9 360 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5000

#92
RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
99%
#93
Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
99%
#94
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799
89%
#201
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2984%
#216
FirePro W5000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
100%
#219
FirePro W7000 Adapter
MSRP: $899|Avg: $15
99%
#220
Quadro K420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
98%
#223
FirePro W7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $50
97%
#224
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $100
96%
#226
FirePro D500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
92%
#227
FirePro 3D V4800
MSRP: $189|Avg: $20
91%
#231
GRID T4-2Q
MSRP: $845|Avg: $600
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 360

#169
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
354%
#171
321%
#172
320%
#176
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
291%
#177
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
289%
#179
Radeon R9 360
MSRP: $99|Avg: $55
100%
#180
100%
#181
GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
99%
#182
Radeon 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
99%
#183
GeForce GT 525M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
98%
#185
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#187
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W5000.

InsightFirePro W5000Radeon R9 360
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W5000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W5000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $55), it costs 27% less, resulting in a 34.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro W5000Radeon R9 360
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+34.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W5000 and Radeon R9 360

AMD

FirePro W5000

The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R9 360

The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W5000 scores 2,967 and the Radeon R9 360 reaches 3,032 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 360 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W5000) vs 512 (Radeon R9 360). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro W5000) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360).

FeatureFirePro W5000Radeon R9 360
G3D Mark Score
2,967
3,032+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+50%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.267 TFLOPS+34%
0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
48+50%
32
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W5000Radeon R9 360
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W5000) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 360) — the FirePro W5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W5000Radeon R9 360
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W5000) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 360). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W5000Radeon R9 360
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W5000) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 360). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W5000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 360).

FeatureFirePro W5000Radeon R9 360
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W5000 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 360's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 165mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

FeatureFirePro W5000Radeon R9 360
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
183mm
165mm
Height
111mm
110mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
75
Perf/Watt
39.6
101.1+155%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W5000 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R9 360 launched at $99 and now averages $55. The FirePro W5000 costs 27.3% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 74.2 (FirePro W5000) vs 55.1 (Radeon R9 360) — the FirePro W5000 offers 34.7% better value. The Radeon R9 360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W5000Radeon R9 360
MSRP
$599
$99-83%
Avg Price (30d)
$40-27%
$55
Performance per Dollar
74.2+35%
55.1
Codename
Pitcairn
Tropo
Release
August 7 2012
May 5 2015
Ranking
#585
#711