FirePro W5000 vs Quadro K1200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W5000 vs Quadro K1200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W5000 vs Quadro K1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W5000

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
99.7% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quadro K1200

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 99.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro W5000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (2,967 vs 2,965), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K1200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 99.5% (9.9 vs 5.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K1200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W5000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W5000 vs Quadro K1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W5000

The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro K1200

The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W5000 scores 2,967 and the Quadro K1200 reaches 2,965 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro K1200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W5000) vs 512 (Quadro K1200). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro W5000) vs 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200).

Feature	FirePro W5000	Quadro K1200
G3D Mark Score	2,967	2,965
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+50%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.267 TFLOPS+20%	1.0578 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+50%	32
L1 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W5000	Quadro K1200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W5000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1200 carries 4 GB. Quadro K1200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W5000 and 64-bit on the Quadro K1200. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W5000) vs 2 MB (Quadro K1200) — the Quadro K1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W5000	Quadro K1200
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W5000 draws 75W versus the Quadro K1200's 45W — a 50% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5000) vs 350W (Quadro K1200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro W5000	Quadro K1200
TDP	75W	45W-40%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	183mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	39.6	65.9+66%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W5000 came in at $599, while the Quadro K1200 launched at $300. On MSRP, Quadro K1200 was 49.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (FirePro W5000) vs 9.9 (Quadro K1200) — the Quadro K1200 offers 98% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K1200 (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro W5000	Quadro K1200
MSRP	$599	$300-50%
Performance per Dollar	5.0	9.9+98%
Codename	Pitcairn	GM107
Release	August 7 2012	January 28 2015
Ranking	#585	#586

Search FirePro W5000 on Amazon

Search Quadro K1200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.