FirePro W5000 vs Radeon 740M

FirePro W5000

2012Core: 825 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 740M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2800 MHz

FirePro W5000 vs Radeon 740M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W5000 vs Radeon 740M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W5000

2012

Why buy it

  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Radeon 740M

2024

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022βˆ’2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • βœ…Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.
  • βœ…More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022βˆ’2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 740M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (3,045 vs 2,967), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 740M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 4 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W5000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro W5000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 740M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W5000 vs Radeon 740M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W5000

The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon 740M

The Radeon 740M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 4 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,045 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W5000 scores 2,967 and the Radeon 740M reaches 3,045 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 740M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W5000) vs 256 (Radeon 740M). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro W5000) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon 740M).

FeatureFirePro W5000Radeon 740M
G3D Mark Score
2,967
3,045+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
768+200%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.267 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS+126%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
48+200%
16
L1 Cache
192 KB+200%
64 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W5000Radeon 740M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W5000 and System on the Radeon 740M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W5000) vs 2 MB (Radeon 740M) β€” the Radeon 740M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W5000Radeon 740M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W5000 draws 75W versus the Radeon 740M's 45W β€” a 50% difference. The Radeon 740M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5000) vs 350W (Radeon 740M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureFirePro W5000Radeon 740M
TDP
75W
45W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
183mm
β€”
Height
111mm
β€”
Slots
1
β€”
Temp (Load)
75Β°C
β€”
Perf/Watt
39.6
67.7+71%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 740M (2024 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W5000Radeon 740M
MSRP
$599
β€”
Codename
Pitcairn
Phoenix2
Release
August 7 2012
January 31 2024
Ranking
#585
#581

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.